On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:28:11 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 19 June 2013 22:42, Lukasz Majewski <[email protected]> wrote: > > The struct cpufreq_driver has been extended to embrace the > > information related to boost support. > > > > When "boost_mode" device tree attribute is defined for a platform, > > the boost_supported flag is set. Moreover boost related attributes > > were exported. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Myungjoo Ham <[email protected]> > > > > Changes for v4: > > - None > > > > Changes for v3: > > - Remove low level boost code > > - Move boost management code to cpufreq core code > > - Use boost_supported flag to indicate if driver supports over > > clocking > > > > Changes for v2: > > - Removal of struct cpufreq_boost > > - Removal of the CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_BOOST flag > > - low_level_boost with valid address when boost is supported > > --- > > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > Yes, this looks fine.. > > I will Ack the whole series in the end, so no individual acks :)
Ok. -- Best regards, Lukasz Majewski Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
