On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:41:33AM +0100, Nick Dyer wrote: > Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:49:01PM +0100, Nick Dyer wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Nick Dyer <[email protected]> > > > > So before we allocated input device before requesting IRQ, now we fo it > > afterwards so there is moment where the interrupt is requested and not > > disabled and input device is not allocated yet. Is it possible for > > interrupt to happen at that moment? > > Yes, and it will be handled correctly, there are guards in the correct > places to ensure the input device will not be used before being registered. > > It is registered at this point since there are several paths that might > need the interrupt handler (for example, to handle flash if device is in > failed state, or to upload configuration if necessary).
OK, thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
