On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 16:31 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Enrico Mioso <[email protected]>
[]
> > +     int ret = 0;
> > +     struct usbnet *usbnet_dev = usb_get_intfdata(intf);
> > +     struct huawei_cdc_ncm_state *drvstate = (void *)&usbnet_dev->data;
> > +     struct cdc_ncm_ctx *ctx = drvstate->ctx;
> > +     bool callsub = (intf == ctx->control && drvstate->subdriver && 
> > drvstate->subdriver->resume); /* should we call subdriver's resume? ? */
> 
> Likewise, and order local function variable declarations by line
> length, longest to shortest.

I think the premise of local variable
declaration by line length is flawed.

It can't work when local variables are
dependent on initialization order as
above.

int ret; could be moved down below callsub
if really desired though.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to