Before we start the development of the S+core, Sunplus had licensed ARM and MIPS. We develop S+core for other reason such as the price. Some products on the web of Sunplus adopt S+core , for example the SPV7050.(http://w3.sunplus.com/products/spv7050.asp) These products could still be bought from the market. Some high-end products adopt ARM or MIPS. So, there is no conflict for a company adopts multiple architectures.
As I said, we recognize that we rarely update because of the limited applications and rare requests from customers. Maybe we don’t understand the culture enough; we think that it is unnecessary if we have no new bugs or new functions, the thought seems wrong. We can commit some patches in the near future. Best, Lennox 2013/9/2 Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net>: > On 09/01/2013 09:13 PM, Lennox Wu wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> Indeed, Sunplus S+core is not a popular architecture and there is no >> standalone to be sold so you should not find related news on the >> Internet. However, the s+core is adopted by our SoCs and these SoCs >> are indeed adopted by some companies, we hope the architecture can be >> reserved to provide the more and more powerful Linux for our >> customers. It is true that we rarely update the code because that we >> are rarely requested to add new functions and to correct bugs by our >> customers, and it is also because we have no new product to release. >> In the near future, we will release some patches for the existed >> S+core architecture. >> > > Key question is not if the platform is popular, but if it is maintained. > The commit log over the last two years strongly suggests that this is > not the case. I suspect that the code is far from compilable at this point, > much less executable. Unfortunately this is hard to verify, as a pre-built > or even buildable toolchain is not easily available. > > From a company perspective, you might want to decide if you want to put > resources into this architecture to keep it alive, or focus on more recent > chips and architectures. Information available on the internet suggests > that Suncore's more recent chips are based on ARM. Given that, it appears > somewhat unlikely that resources for maintaining S+core will be made > available. Guess we'll see if the situation changes. > > Guenter > > >> 2013/8/31 Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net>: >>> >>> The web site associated with the score architecture in MAINTAINERS >>> is non-functional and available for sale. The last Ack from one >>> of the maintainers was in December 2012. The main maintainer's last >>> commit was in 2011. The last maintainer pull request was early 2011. >>> >>> Cc: Lennox Wu <lennox...@gmail.com> >>> Cc: Chen Liqin <liqin.c...@sunplusct.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> >>> --- >>> More housekeeping. >>> >>> Maybe this removal request is a bit early, but architecture support seems >>> to have vanished entirely. At the very least this puts interested parties >>> (if there are any) on notice. >>> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/