On 12 September 2013 10:55, Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
> First three of the patchset are minor cleanups (you may or may not take them 
> for
> 3.12), but last two are some real fixes.. I haven't faced any issue without 
> them
> but simply found them in code review.

> Viresh Kumar (5):
>   cpufreq: Remove extra blank line
>   cpufreq: don't break string in print statements
>   cpufreq: remove __cpufreq_remove_dev()
>   cpufreq: don't update policy->cpu while removing while removing other
>     CPUs
>   cpufreq: use correct values of cpus in __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish()

So in the end there is only one real fix in this series as 4/4/ is already in..

To make it clear again these are my pending patches for cpufreq:
For 3.12-rc2:
- 5/5 of this patchset (modified one)..
- "serialize freq transitions" that I will send separately today as Guennadi
has already tested that ..

For 3.13:
- First 3 patches from this series (I tried rebase them over your linux-next and
didn't found any issue)
- 5 patches from: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1781051
- And the rest ~220 patches that I will send soon (Will rebase them
over all above
patches)..

Thanks.
Viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to