Hi, On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 01:27:48PM -0700, Julius Werner wrote: > *Ping!* > > Are there still unanswered concerns left with this patch? I hope my > prior mails could clear up why I think that the PMU register > description in the device tree for a specific PHY is represents the > hardware more accurately after my patch, and my analysis of the > Exynos4 situation currently not being implemented (and therefore not > needing to be addressed by this patch) was correct. Please let me know > if you have further objections... and if not, could we agree to have > this picked up somewhere?
I need acks for DTS part... -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
