On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 05:53:31PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > Hi Felipe, > > On Tuesday 17 of September 2013 10:36:16 Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 01:27:48PM -0700, Julius Werner wrote: > > > *Ping!* > > > > > > Are there still unanswered concerns left with this patch? I hope my > > > prior mails could clear up why I think that the PMU register > > > description in the device tree for a specific PHY is represents the > > > hardware more accurately after my patch, and my analysis of the > > > Exynos4 situation currently not being implemented (and therefore not > > > needing to be addressed by this patch) was correct. Please let me know > > > if you have further objections... and if not, could we agree to have > > > this picked up somewhere? > > > > I need acks for DTS part... > > This patch breaks Exynos 4, so it's a NAK from me. > > Anyway, a new, completely redesigned PHY driver supporting most of the PHY > features (as opposed to only the basic subset currently) developed by Kamil > Debski should show up soon, so I don't think there is any reason to apply > any patches to this old driver.
awesome, then I espect to see a patch deleting the old driver shortly :-) cheers -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
