On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 08:33:21AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 06:55:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 08:47:39PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 06:17:23PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > From: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenac...@free-electrons.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker 
> > > > <michael.opdenac...@free-electrons.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > > ---
> > > 
> > > See comment below.
> > > 
> > > >  Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt | 2 +-
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt 
> > > > b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt
> > > > index 7703ec7..ad6cba4 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt
> > > > @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements 
> > > > are always welcome!
> > > >         the corresponding readers must disable preemption, possibly
> > > >         by calling rcu_read_lock_sched() and rcu_read_unlock_sched().
> > > >         If the updater uses synchronize_srcu() or call_srcu(),
> > > > -       the the corresponding readers must use srcu_read_lock() and
> > > > +       the corresponding readers must use srcu_read_lock() and
> > > 
> > > I think this may have actually been a typo for "then", as in "If the
> > > updater uses ..., then the corresponding readers must use ...".
> > 
> > Good point -- that would make the sentence construction parallel with
> > the surrounding sentences.  Updated patch below.
> > 
> >                                                     Thanx, Paul
> > 
> > rcu: Fix occurrence of "the the" in checklist.txt
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenac...@free-electrons.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > [ paulmck: Add "then" as suggested by Josh Triplett. ]
> 
> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org>

Got it, thank you again!

                                                        Thanx, Paul

> > diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt 
> > b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt
> > index 7703ec7..9126619 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt
> > @@ -202,8 +202,8 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are 
> > always welcome!
> >     updater uses call_rcu_sched() or synchronize_sched(), then
> >     the corresponding readers must disable preemption, possibly
> >     by calling rcu_read_lock_sched() and rcu_read_unlock_sched().
> > -   If the updater uses synchronize_srcu() or call_srcu(),
> > -   the the corresponding readers must use srcu_read_lock() and
> > +   If the updater uses synchronize_srcu() or call_srcu(), then
> > +   the corresponding readers must use srcu_read_lock() and
> >     srcu_read_unlock(), and with the same srcu_struct.  The rules for
> >     the expedited primitives are the same as for their non-expedited
> >     counterparts.  Mixing things up will result in confusion and
> > 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to