On 10/07, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> Within __change_pid(), 'new' may be NULL if it comes from detach_pid(),
> and 'link->pid' also may be NULL ("link->pid = new"), so theoretically,\
> the original 'link->pid' may be NULL, too.

I don't really understand this "theoretically",

> In real world, at least now, all callers which will call detach_pid()
> or change_pid() will not cause issue,

Yes,

> but still recommend to check it
> in __change_pid() to let itself consistency.

Why?

Contrary, I think we should not hide the problem. If __change_pid() is
called when task->pids[type].pid is already NULL there is something
seriously wrong.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to