This patch converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight .target_index() routine for this driver.
CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this routine and will pass index to it. Cc: Kukjin Kim <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> --- drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 21 +++------------------ drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 21 +++++---------------- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c index 3e4af67..9982fcb 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c @@ -65,9 +65,6 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_scale(unsigned int target_freq) freqs.old = policy->cur; freqs.new = target_freq; - if (freqs.new == freqs.old) - goto out; - /* * The policy max have been changed so that we cannot get proper * old_index with cpufreq_frequency_table_target(). Thus, ignore @@ -151,13 +148,9 @@ out: return ret; } -static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, - unsigned int target_freq, - unsigned int relation) +static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) { struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table = exynos_info->freq_table; - unsigned int index; - unsigned int new_freq; int ret = 0; mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock); @@ -165,15 +158,7 @@ static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, if (frequency_locked) goto out; - if (cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_table, - target_freq, relation, &index)) { - ret = -EINVAL; - goto out; - } - - new_freq = freq_table[index].frequency; - - ret = exynos_cpufreq_scale(new_freq); + ret = exynos_cpufreq_scale(freq_table[index].frequency); out: mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock); @@ -247,7 +232,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = { .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY, .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify, - .target = exynos_target, + .target_index = exynos_target, .get = exynos_getspeed, .init = exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init, .exit = cpufreq_generic_exit, diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c index 8ae5e29..1bf9b06 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c @@ -214,27 +214,17 @@ static unsigned int exynos_getspeed(unsigned int cpu) return dvfs_info->cur_frequency; } -static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, - unsigned int target_freq, - unsigned int relation) +static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) { - unsigned int index, tmp; - int ret = 0, i; + unsigned int tmp; + int i; struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table = dvfs_info->freq_table; mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock); - ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_table, - target_freq, relation, &index); - if (ret) - goto out; - freqs.old = dvfs_info->cur_frequency; freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency; - if (freqs.old == freqs.new) - goto out; - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); /* Set the target frequency in all C0_3_PSTATE register */ @@ -245,9 +235,8 @@ static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, __raw_writel(tmp, dvfs_info->base + XMU_C0_3_PSTATE + i * 4); } -out: mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock); - return ret; + return 0; } static void exynos_cpufreq_work(struct work_struct *work) @@ -325,7 +314,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = { .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY, .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify, - .target = exynos_target, + .target_index = exynos_target, .get = exynos_getspeed, .init = exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init, .exit = cpufreq_generic_exit, -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
