On 10/28, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:31:28AM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > + > > +Optional properties: > > +- interrupt-names: Should contain the interrupt names "l1_irq" and > > + "l2_irq" > > As with my comment on the parsing code, I'd prefer that if interrupt-names was > present it defined the order of interrupts. Otherwise it's redundant and of no > value. > > Otherwise, the binding looks fine to me: > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
How about I just drop the interrupt-names property? It isn't adding much and is a holdover from the vendor kernel. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
