On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:56:10PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: SNIP
> * double accounting. > @@ -501,8 +528,29 @@ iter_add_next_cumulative_entry(struct add_entry_iter > *iter, > { > struct perf_evsel *evsel = iter->evsel; > struct perf_sample *sample = iter->sample; > + struct cumulative_cache *ccache = iter->priv; > struct hist_entry *he; > int err = 0; > + int i; > + > + /* > + * Check if there's duplicate entries in the callchain. > + * It's possible that it has cycles or recursive calls. > + */ > + for (i = 0; i < iter->curr; i++) { > + if (sort__has_sym) { > + if (ccache[i].sym == al->sym) > + return 0; > + } else { > + /* Not much we can do - just compare the dso. */ > + if (ccache[i].dso == al->map->dso) > + return 0; > + } > + } hum, do we want to prevent recursion totaly? how about intended recursion? also should the dso be checked together with sym? because the symbol is defined like dso::sym jirka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/