On 10/26/2013 6:51 AM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Tetsuo Handa wrote: >> I would send another one which uses only security_file_alloc/free . > I sent it to James, Casey and Kees on "Fri, 18 Oct 2013 22:56:19 +0900" and > waiting for your response. How long are we expected to remain vulnerable due > to > lack of multiple concurrent LSM support?
Having just spent a good chunk of the past year on the technical issues, and having participated in the LSM development process since its inception, I'd say there's at least a year before the dust settles. Having a wad of code that works is one thing. Breaking it into chunks that are both useful and small enough for the community to swallow is another. Transforming a collection of clever hacks into an infrastructure is a third. Once that's done we can deal with the naysayers. Fortunately, we have a wad of code that works. Nobody seems to think that taking that code as is is a great idea. Nobody has this as their first priority, either. We're making progress, but we know we need to be careful. I seriously doubt we'll get more than one shot at it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
