On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:10:44 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all, > > During Kernel Summit Dave mentioned that there wasn't a clear maintainer for > locking bits. > > To remedy this Ingo suggested gathering all the various locking primitives and > lockdep into a single place: kernel/locking/. > > I would further like to propose a MAINTAINERS entry like: > > LOCKING > M: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> > M: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> > M: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> > M: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]> > M: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> > T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git > locking/core > S: Maintained > F: kernel/locking/ I wonder if it should be called kernel/locks, as that's less to type, smaller path names, and tastes good on bagels. -- Steve > > Because for most 'fun' locking discussions we usually end up with at least > those people anyway :-) > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
