op 05-11-13 14:18, Steven Rostedt schreef:
> On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:10:44 +0100
> Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> During Kernel Summit Dave mentioned that there wasn't a clear maintainer for
>> locking bits.
>>
>> To remedy this Ingo suggested gathering all the various locking primitives
>> and
>> lockdep into a single place: kernel/locking/.
>>
>> I would further like to propose a MAINTAINERS entry like:
>>
>> LOCKING
>> M: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com>
>> M: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
>> M: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
>> M: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> M: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
>> T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
>> locking/core
>> S: Maintained
>> F: kernel/locking/
> I wonder if it should be called kernel/locks, as that's less to type,
> smaller path names, and tastes good on bagels.
>
> -- Steve
>
Congratulations! You're our early bikeshed winner for today. Please pick your
favorite color at http://bikeshed.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
