On 11/06/2013 09:12 AM, Chao Yu wrote:

> A NULL point should avoid to be used in destroy_segment_manager after 
> allocating memory fail for f2fs_sm_info.

Though without this patch it still can work well, because if it failed
to allocate f2fs_sm_info, the sit_info, free_info... all were NULL, and
the destory path(e.g. destroy_dirty_segmap) can deal with them well.
IMO, this patch is still a good catch. 

Regards,
Gu

> 
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c |    2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 3d4d5fc..ff363e6
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -1744,6 +1744,8 @@ static void destroy_sit_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>  void destroy_segment_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>  {
>       struct f2fs_sm_info *sm_info = SM_I(sbi);
> +     if (!sm_info)
> +             return;
>       destroy_dirty_segmap(sbi);
>       destroy_curseg(sbi);
>       destroy_free_segmap(sbi);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to