On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> * Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > * Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > The changelog is missing and the title is not self-explanatory.
>>
>> Either the local IRQs should be enabled for both the restart and halt
>> blinks, or it shouldn't be enabled for either. Why enable them for
>> halt, but not restart?
>>
>> I think enabling them for restart too makes sense.
>
> Such arguments belong into the changelog, with a description of what was
> done before and what is done after - please use the customary (verbose)
> changelog style we use in the kernel.

I'm not going to re-roll with such description only so you can NAK it
again. If you agree that such an explanation is OK, say so.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to