* David Ahern <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 11/11/13, 1:22 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >+    if (perf_target__has_task(target))
> >+            return perf_event__synthesize_thread_map(tool, threads, 
> >process, machine, data_mmap);
> >+    else if (perf_target__has_cpu(target))
> >+            return perf_event__synthesize_threads(tool, process, machine, 
> >data_mmap);
> 
> 
> Getting kind of long on the line lengths...

Maybe we could start losing most of the perf_ prefixes - it's all about 
perf here, so it does not really add much information, does it?

that would turn it into:

        if (target__has_task(target))
                return event__synthesize_thread_map(tool, threads, process, 
machine, data_mmap);
        else if (target__has_cpu(target))
                return event__synthesize_threads(tool, process, machine, 
data_mmap);

Another trick would be to combine (tool, machine) into a single helper 
struct (struct context *ctx?), if that is mostly a constant combination 
describing tool environment, which gets passed deep inside the guts of 
functions.

Thanks,

        Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to