On 11/22/2013 05:08 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 02:59:31PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> +extern void __lockfunc rt_spin_try_unlock(spinlock_t *lock); > > I know what you mean, but.. try_unlock() just sounds wrong, how can we > attempt but fail to unlock a lock we hold ;-)
what about - rt_spin_unlock_try_or_fail(); - __rt_spin_unlock_dont_use_me() Couldn't we tell lockdep to bend the rules in this case? > > > /me crawls back under his rock ;-) :) Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
