On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 12:40 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:31:35PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > +struct gpio_desc *sfi_get_gpiod_by_name(const char *name); >> >> I'm wondering should this function be exported at all? What the drivers >> should be using is gpiod_get_xxx() APIs and not DT/ACPI/SFI specific >> interfaces. > > I won't mix this with generic stuff since we have really few users of > SFI and there should be no new users at all. > >> Yeah, we have the same in ACPI version but I'm planning to get rid of it >> completely. > > I'm okay to move to this direction, if Linus and others are okay with > it. Go for it. Mika is right that we need to get rid of any custom calls and this is the way ACPI is moving too... Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/