On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:51:22AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> > > In commit c9e9042994d3 ("ipv4: fix possible seqlock deadlock") I left > another places where IP_INC_STATS_BH() were improperly used. > > udp_sendmsg(), ping_v4_sendmsg() and tcp_v4_connect() are called from > process context, not from softirq context. > > This was detected by lockdep seqlock support. > > Reported-by: jongman heo <[email protected]> > Fixes: 584bdf8cbdf6 ("[IPV4]: Fix "ipOutNoRoutes" counter error for TCP and > UDP") > Fixes: c319b4d76b9e ("net: ipv4: add IPPROTO_ICMP socket kind") > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> > Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <[email protected]>
Just got home after getting distracted with other things today and the work is already done. Thanks, Eric! ;) Exactly the spots I noticed this morning, so Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <[email protected]> Should we do something about the naming? I find it rather dangerous because they look like the _bh lock postfixes but act exactly in the opposite? Greetings, Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
