On 11/28/13, 1:36 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi David,

Just minor nits below..

On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 13:32:45 -0700, David Ahern wrote:
Allows list of idle symbols to be leveraged by other commands,
such as the upcoming timehist command.

[SNIP]
+bool symbol__is_idle(struct symbol *sym)
+{
+       const char * const idle_symbols[] = {

Wouldn't it better making it static?  It seems to build a table
everytime otherwise.

Checked a couple of gcc's (4.3.2 32-bit and 4.6.3 64-bit) and both put idle_symbols in read-only data section. e.g.,

0000000000000020 r idle_symbols.13404

So I think it is fine as is.



+               "cpu_idle",
+               "intel_idle",
+               "default_idle",
+               "native_safe_halt",
+               "enter_idle",
+               "exit_idle",
+               "mwait_idle",
+               "mwait_idle_with_hints",
+               "poll_idle",
+               "ppc64_runlatch_off",
+               "pseries_dedicated_idle_sleep",
+               NULL
+       };
+
+       int i;
+
+       if (!sym)
+               return false;
+
+       for (i = 0; idle_symbols[i]; i++) {

Also we can use ARRAY_SIZE() here and let the last NULL go IMHO.

I copied what was in builtin-top.c.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to