On 12/19/2013 09:11 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 12/19/2013 06:04 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 12/19/2013 07:13 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>>>> This reverts commit 97bc386fc12deeb41d5bff33548e3002b258d4e0.
>>>>
>>>> Generic syscall table generator relies on ARCH unistd.h as follows:
>>>>
>>>> void *sys_call_table[NR_syscalls] = {
>>>> [0 ... NR_syscalls-1] = sys_ni_syscall,
>>>> #include <asm/unistd.h>
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> And turns out that prior dependencies already include that header by
>>>> the time preprocessor hits the above. Meaning ARCH unistd.h needs to be
>>>> able to included twice.
>>>>
>> OK, thanks, it sounds reasonable to me.
>>
>> But why many other architectures contents these guard macros? (arm, sh,
>> blackfin, cris, frv, ia64, m32r, m68k, mips, s390, microblaze, mn10300,
>> parisc, powerpc, sparc, x86). Do they need improvement too?
>>
>> And for our case, what xtensa has done looks like a better way to me.
>
> Yeah, looks like that'll work - good find. Linus, please ignore the Revert,
> I'll
> follow up with a pull request.
>
Thanks. :-)
> -Vineet
>
--
Chen Gang
Open, share and attitude like air, water and life which God blessed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
