Hi Roger,

On Wednesday 08 January 2014 03:17 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> From: Balaji T K <balaj...@ti.com>
> 
> Some platforms have a PHY hooked up to the
> SATA controller. The PHY needs to be initialized
> and powered up for SATA to work. We do that
> using the PHY framework.
> 
> [Roger Q] Cleaned up.
> 
> CC: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Balaji T K <balaj...@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rog...@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/ahci.h          |  2 ++
>  drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.h b/drivers/ata/ahci.h
> index 2289efd..f9bbada 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.h
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.h
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/libata.h>
> +#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
>  
>  /* Enclosure Management Control */
>  #define EM_CTRL_MSG_TYPE              0x000f0000
> @@ -322,6 +323,7 @@ struct ahci_host_priv {
>       u32                     em_buf_sz;      /* EM buffer size in byte */
>       u32                     em_msg_type;    /* EM message type */
>       struct clk              *clk;           /* Only for platforms 
> supporting clk */
> +     struct phy              *phy;           /* If platform uses phy */
>       void                    *plat_data;     /* Other platform data */
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> index d5ced13..f61093b 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> @@ -142,6 +142,21 @@ static int ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>               }
>       }
>  
> +     hpriv->phy = devm_phy_get(dev, "sata-phy");
> +     if (IS_ERR(hpriv->phy)) {
> +             dev_dbg(dev, "can't get sata-phy\n");
> +             /* return only if -EPROBE_DEFER */
> +             if (PTR_ERR(hpriv->phy) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> +                     rc = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +                     goto disable_unprepare_clk;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     if (!IS_ERR(hpriv->phy)) {
> +             phy_init(hpriv->phy);

Don't we have to check the return values of phy_init and phy_power_on? Is it
not needed because it is an optional phy?

Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to