* Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> > But what I really can't understans is what "check == 0" means? It
> > seems that in fact it can be 1 or 2? Or, iow, "check == 0" is
> > actually equivalent to "check == 1" ?
>
> Hmm indeed, the comment in lockdep.h says 0 means no checks at all,
> but the code doesn't actually appear to work like that. I'm not sure
> it ever did or not, I'd have to go dig through history.
>
> That said, given the current state it certainly looks like we can
> remove the check argument.
>
> Ingo?
Agreed.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
