On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 09:55 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Dave Hansen <[email protected]> wrote:

> > From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
> > 
> > There are 7 architecures with "config SECCOMP".  They all have
> > virtually the same help text except for those referencing the
> > /proc interface.  The /proc interface was removed in 2007.
> > 
> > There is *NOTHING* architecture-specific about SECCOMP except
> > that the syscalls have per-architecture definitions, like every
> > other syscall.  It is absurd to have the option in the
> > arch-specific menus.
> > 
> > Move it to the security menu, consolidate the 7 down to one, and
> > remove the embarassingly-ancient help text references and
> > dependencies on /proc.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Cc: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Mimi Zohar <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]> 

For powerpc:

Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to