On 18.02.2014 02:02, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, February 10, 2014 02:00:11 PM Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
Whenever we register ISA interrupt or not, we need to free the IRQ routing
table entry.

Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c |    1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
index b0e31b6..6ec0f36 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
@@ -432,6 +432,7 @@ int acpi_pci_irq_enable(struct pci_dev *dev)
  #endif
                dev_warn(&dev->dev, "PCI INT %c: no GSI\n", pin_name(pin));

+               kfree(entry);

If I'm not mistaken, entry is always NULL here, isn't it?
acpi_pci_link_allocate_irq() can return negative gsi even if entry != NULL. For that case we'd have memory leak.

                return 0;
        }



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to