On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:11:31AM +0000, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <linux/ptrace.h>
> #include <linux/user.h>
> +#include <linux/seccomp.h>
> #include <linux/security.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/signal.h>
> @@ -1064,6 +1065,10 @@ asmlinkage int syscall_trace(int dir, struct pt_regs
> *regs)
> {
> unsigned long saved_reg;
>
> + if (!dir && secure_computing((int)regs->syscallno))
> + /* seccomp failures shouldn't expose any additional code. */
> + return -1;
That's only restricted to the arm64 code but could we use a more
meaningful error number?
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
