On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 04:11:59PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote: > On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 11:10:48AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This is just regmap_multi_reg_write() I think? That already exists, the > > theory was that we're going to get an optimised version of that for some > > hardware which can stream things and cut out some overheads though that > > doesn't seem to have materialised yet. > I had missed regmap_multi_reg_write but the difference here is that we > apply cache bypass, and that the cache bypass is only applied whilst the > regmap lock is held. This allows users to be sure that no writes > from other threads will accidentally have the bypass applied to them. Right, OK - but it should still be a wrapper for a core implementation and share interface/naming.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
