On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: > On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Jingoo Han <jg1....@samsung.com> wrote: >> > On Monday, February 24, 2014 6:40 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> >> >> There is no reason to care about irq_desc in that context, escpecially >> >> as irq_data for that interrupt is retrieved as well. >> >> >> >> Use the proper accessor for the msi descriptor >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> >> >> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com> >> >> Cc: Jingoo Han <jg1....@samsung.com> >> >> Cc: Mohit Kumar <mohit.ku...@st.com> >> >> Cc: pci <linux-...@vger.kernel.org> >> > >> > Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1....@samsung.com> >> >> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com> >> >> Thomas, I assume you'll merge this along with the rest of your series. >> I don't have any pending changes in this area. > > I can do, but it does not depend on anything else, so you can pick it > up as well. Either way is fine.
I never know what to do with these. I suggested that you pick it up so the whole series would be together, because I assumed it would make more sense in the git history to have all these similar changes grouped together. But maybe that really doesn't matter. What's the recommended practice? Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
