Agree with Linus; this is starting to look pretty good.
I still have nits though :)
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Davidlohr Bueso <davidl...@hp.com> wrote:
> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> +#ifndef __LINUX_VMACACHE_H
> +#define __LINUX_VMACACHE_H
> +
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> +#define VMACACHE_BITS 2
> +#else
> +#define VMACACHE_BITS 0
> +#endif
I wouldn't even both with the #ifdef here - why not just always use 2 bits ?
> +#define vmacache_flush(tsk) \
> + do { \
> + memset(tsk->vmacache, 0, sizeof(tsk->vmacache)); \
> + } while (0)
I think inline functions are preferred
> diff --git a/mm/nommu.c b/mm/nommu.c
> index 8740213..9a5347b 100644
> --- a/mm/nommu.c
> +++ b/mm/nommu.c
> @@ -768,16 +768,19 @@ static void add_vma_to_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, struct
> vm_area_struct *vma)
> */
> static void delete_vma_from_mm(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> + int i;
> struct address_space *mapping;
> struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> + struct task_struct *curr = current;
>
> kenter("%p", vma);
>
> protect_vma(vma, 0);
>
> mm->map_count--;
> - if (mm->mmap_cache == vma)
> - mm->mmap_cache = NULL;
> + for (i = 0; i < VMACACHE_SIZE; i++)
> + if (curr->vmacache[i] == vma)
> + curr->vmacache[i] = NULL;
Why is the invalidation done differently here ? shouldn't it be done
by bumping the mm's sequence number so that invalidation works accross
all threads sharing that mm ?
> +#ifndef CONFIG_MMU
> +struct vm_area_struct *vmacache_find_exact(struct mm_struct *mm,
> + unsigned long start,
> + unsigned long end)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + if (!vmacache_valid(mm))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < VMACACHE_SIZE; i++) {
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma = current->vmacache[i];
> +
> + if (vma && vma->vm_start == start && vma->vm_end == end)
> + return vma;
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> +
> +}
> +#endif
I think the caller could do instead
vma = vmacache_find(mm, start)
if (vma && vma->vm_start == start && vma->vm_end == end) {
}
I.e. better deal with it at the call site than add a new vmacache
function for it.
These are nits, the code looks good already.
I would like to propose an LRU eviction scheme to replace your
VMACACHE_HASH mechanism; I will probably do that as a follow-up once
you have the code in andrew's tree.
Reviewed-by: Michel Lespinasse <wal...@google.com>
--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
