Hi, On 03/05/2014 07:54 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Robert, > > On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 03:58:17PM +0100, Robert Baldyga wrote: >> >> -int max8997_write_reg(struct i2c_client *i2c, u8 reg, u8 value) >> +int max8997_write_reg(struct regmap *map, u8 reg, u8 value) > > Why don't you make read/write reg to take struct max8997_dev as argument > instead of regmap? regmap seems to be the current implementation du jur, > but that is core's detail, functions do not need to care. > > Thanks. >
It's because there are few regmaps in max8997_dev, and read/write reg functions has no way to check which regmap should be used. I think it would be clearer if I remove this functions and use regmap_read and regmap_write instead, because there is no particular purpose for them. Best regards Robert Baldyga Samsung R&D Institute Poland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
