From: Mark Charlebois <charl...@gmail.com>

This code makes a compile time type check that is optimized away. Clang
complains that it generates an unused function.

I believe GCC won't complain for a static inline fuction but would if it
was just a static function.

Adding the unused attribute to the function definition removes the warning.

This code works for both gcc and clang.

Signed-off-by: Mark Charlebois <charl...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Behan Webster <beh...@converseincode.com>
---
 include/linux/moduleparam.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/moduleparam.h b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
index c3eb102..7f2a726 100644
--- a/include/linux/moduleparam.h
+++ b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ static inline void destroy_params(const struct kernel_param 
*params,
 /* The macros to do compile-time type checking stolen from Jakub
    Jelinek, who IIRC came up with this idea for the 2.4 module init code. */
 #define __param_check(name, p, type) \
-       static inline type *__check_##name(void) { return(p); }
+       static inline __always_unused type *__check_##name(void) { return(p); }
 
 extern struct kernel_param_ops param_ops_byte;
 extern int param_set_byte(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp);
-- 
1.8.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to