On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:20:37 +0100, Philipp Zabel <p.za...@pengutronix.de>
wrote:
> If of_graph_get_next_endpoint is given a parentless node instead of an
> endpoint node, it is clearly a bug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.za...@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@linaro.org>
> ---
> Changes since v5:
> - Added parentless previous endpoint's full name to warning
> ---
> drivers/of/base.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index b2f223f..b5e690b 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -2028,8 +2028,8 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_endpoint(const
> struct device_node *parent,
> of_node_put(node);
> } else {
> port = of_get_parent(prev);
> - if (!port)
> - /* Hm, has someone given us the root node ?... */
> + if (WARN_ONCE(!port, "%s(): endpoint %s has no parent node\n",
> + __func__, prev->full_name))
> return NULL;
>
> /* Avoid dropping prev node refcount to 0. */
> --
> 1.9.0.rc3
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
