On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote: > (Of course, I haven't the faintest idea what l_addr in glibc means. > If there was a way to arrange for l_addr to be zero, then maybe none > of this would matter. Hmm, I wonder if just not relocating the vdso > at all would have the desired effect. Anyone out there understand > glibc?)
No, that won't work. The bug is that glibc expects PT_DYNAMIC's vaddr to be the virtual address of the dynamic table. This can only be true if the vdso is mapped at the address that the kernel relocated it to. I also learned that glibc's code is really hideous. Wow. --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
