Noted, thanks.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Joe Perches <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 17:10 -0500, Joe Sylve wrote: >> Should it? The reference manual refers to the architecture as AArch64. >> >> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Joe Perches <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 18:07 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 01:38:44PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 05:00:38AM +0100, Joe Sylve wrote: >> >> > > Section D7.2.83 TCR_EL1, Translation Control Register (EL1) of the >> >> > > latest ARM Architecture Reference Manual, ARMv8, for ARMv8-A states >> >> > > that TCR_EL1 TG1 (bits [31:30]) should be set to 11 for a 64KB >> >> > > TTBR1_EL1 granule size. The mainline 3.14 kernel incorrectly sets >> >> > > those bits to 01 (which is a 16KB granule size). >> > >> > trivia: >> > >> > I think the subject title should be arm64 > > There was a fair amount of blowback about naming > the arch aarch64 in linux. > > So for linux, the directory and arch name is arm64. > > from: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/15/133 > > From Linus Torvalds <> > Date Sun, 15 Jul 2012 16:53:21 -0700 > > - aarch64 is just another druggie name that the ARM people came up > with after drinking too much of the spiked water in cambridge. > > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
