On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:30:47PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 04/09/2014 01:12 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >On śro, 2014-04-09 at 12:57 +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > >>On 04/09/2014 09:21 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>>- buf_size = min(count, (sizeof(buf)-1)); > >>>+ buf_size = min(count, (size_t)(sizeof(buf)-1)); > >>But shouldn't the type of sizeof already be size_t? > >Hmmm... yes it should. It looks like a false positive from Sparse so the > >commit message should be rather "Suppress" than "Fix". > I'm pretty sure it is a bug in sparse, we shouldn't suppress those, but > rather fix them in sparse itself. Either that or there's something else going on that hasn't been properly understood. The above just looks completely bogus.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
