On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Mathias Nyman <mathias.ny...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > Pins may be muxed to alternate function instead of gpio by firmware. > This driver does not touch the pin muxing and expect firmare > to set pin muxing and pullup/down properties properly. > > Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.ny...@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 12 + > drivers/pinctrl/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c | 543 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I know it's been ten months since you posted this driver, but I have a question. If this driver does not touch the pin muxing, and it doesn't even call pinctrl_register(), then why is it in drivers/pinctrl? It's not a pinctrl driver. Why isn't this a regular GPIO drivers in drivers/gpio? -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/