On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:07:16AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Okay, so AFAICS the fix in x86/urgent isn't wrong functionally, it's
> just that the changelog incorrectly claims the raw-spinlock use is a
> bug causing a problem here.
>
> Still that raw spinlock is bogus and might be hiding other problems,
> so we can keep the x86/urgent change (ea431643d6c3) as-is and I'll get
> it to Linus later today ...
Ok.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
