On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:53:16PM -0600, Myron Stowe wrote:
> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com>
>
> AMD hostbridges gnenerally show up as PCI device 0:18.0. This patch adds
> logic to automatically probe the device at this location and check PCI
> device class code.
>
> This patch supports platforms with the following AMD hostbridge types:
> (K8, family10h, 11h, 12h, 14h 15h and 16h processors).
>
> Reference(s):
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72051
> Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), "BIOS and Kernel Developer's
> Guide (BKDG) for AMD Family 15h Models 00h-0fh Processors." Section
> 3.4 Device [1F:18]h Function 1 Configuration Registers; D18F1x[EC:E0]
> Configuration Map, 42301 Rev 3.12 - October 11, 2012.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Myron Stowe <myron.st...@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrish...@amd.com>
> ---
>
> arch/x86/pci/amd_bus.c | 71
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/amd_bus.c b/arch/x86/pci/amd_bus.c
> index e88f4c5..c8cd75c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/amd_bus.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/amd_bus.c
> @@ -11,27 +11,34 @@
>
> #include "bus_numa.h"
>
> +#define AMD_NB_F0_NODE_ID 0x60
> +#define AMD_NB_F0_UNIT_ID 0x64
> +#define AMD_NB_F1_CONFIG_MAP_REG 0xe0
> +
> +#define RANGE_NUM 16
> +#define AMD_NB_F1_CONFIG_MAP_RANGES 4
> +
> /*
> - * This discovers the pcibus <-> node mapping on AMD K8.
> - * also get peer root bus resource for io,mmio
> + * This discovers the pcibus <-> node mapping on AMD K8, Family 10h, 12h,
> + * 14h, 15h, and 16h processor based systems. This also gets peer root bus
> + * resources corresponding to I/O and MMIO addresses.
> */
>
> -struct pci_hostbridge_probe {
> +struct amd_hostbridge {
> u32 bus;
> u32 slot;
> - u32 vendor;
> u32 device;
> };
>
> -static struct pci_hostbridge_probe pci_probes[] __initdata = {
> - { 0, 0x18, PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, 0x1100 },
> - { 0, 0x18, PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, 0x1200 },
> - { 0xff, 0, PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, 0x1200 },
> - { 0, 0x18, PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, 0x1300 },
> +static struct amd_hostbridge hb_probes[] __initdata = {
> + /* Standard AMD Hostbriges are at bus 0x0 slot 0x18.
> + * In case of PCI_ANY_ID, the logic will try matching
> + * PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST instead.
> + */
Standard kernel comment style:
/*
* Something interesting for the code below.
* This is the second comment line.
*/
> + { 0x0 , 0x18, PCI_ANY_ID },
> + { 0xff, 0 , PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_10H_NB_HT },
> };
>
> -#define RANGE_NUM 16
> -
> static struct pci_root_info __init *find_pci_root_info(int node, int link)
> {
> struct pci_root_info *info;
> @@ -75,31 +82,47 @@ static int __init early_fill_mp_bus_info(void)
Btw, this function is huuuge. It could use a splitup some day.
> return -1;
>
> found = false;
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pci_probes); i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hb_probes); i++) {
> u32 id;
> u16 device;
> u16 vendor;
> + u32 class;
>
> - bus = pci_probes[i].bus;
> - slot = pci_probes[i].slot;
> + bus = hb_probes[i].bus;
> + slot = hb_probes[i].slot;
> id = read_pci_config(bus, slot, 0, PCI_VENDOR_ID);
> -
> vendor = id & 0xffff;
> device = (id>>16) & 0xffff;
> - if (pci_probes[i].vendor == vendor &&
> - pci_probes[i].device == device) {
> - found = true;
> - break;
> + class = read_pci_config(bus, slot, 0,
> + PCI_CLASS_REVISION) >> 16;
> +
> + if (PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD == vendor) {
Flip comparison:
if (vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD)
and then save yourself another indentation level:
if (vendor != PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD)
continue;
> + if (hb_probes[i].device == device) {
> + found = true;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if ((hb_probes[i].device == PCI_ANY_ID) &&
> + (class == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST)) {
> + hb_probes[i].device = device;
> + found = true;
> + break;
> + }
> }
> }
>
> - if (!found)
> + if (!found) {
> + pr_warn("AMD hostbridge not found\n");
> return 0;
> + }
I guess this should return a negative value... Not that it matters much
from looking at the call site in the amd_postcore_init initcall.
>
> - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> + pr_debug("Found AMD hostbridge at %x:%x.0\n", bus, slot);
Why not pr_info? I think this is useful info we want to print out at
default level.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
