NeilBrown <[email protected]> wrote: > The wait_on_bit() call in __fscache_wait_on_invalidate() was ambiguous > as it specified TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE but used > fscache_wait_bit_interruptible as an action function. > As any error return is never checked I assumed that 'uninterruptible' > was correct.
Bug. It should be uninterruptible in both places. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
