On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 05:06:10PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > NeilBrown <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The wait_on_bit() call in __fscache_wait_on_invalidate() was ambiguous > > as it specified TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE but used > > fscache_wait_bit_interruptible as an action function. > > As any error return is never checked I assumed that 'uninterruptible' > > was correct. > > Bug. It should be uninterruptible in both places.
Thanks David, queued the patch! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
