On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 06:44:30PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2014 15:00:09 -0700
> "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> > Good points -- I was indeed thinking about stress testing instead of
> > algorithmic testing.
>
> But doesn't lockdep use algorithmic tests too?
I suppose you could argue that there is no such thing as non-algorithmic
testing, given that all test code uses an algorithm of some sort. Perhaps
with the exception of letting your pet walk across the keyboard. ;-)
Perhaps I should have instead said that I was thinking about random
testing instead of formal testing?
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
