Thanks Tomasz,
On 15 May 2014 01:31, Tomasz Figa <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Rahul, Tomasz,
[snip]
>> + simplephys: simple-phys@10040000 {
>> + compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-simple-phy";
>
> Missing reg property or unnecessary @unit-address suffix in node name.
I should have removed "@unit-address". I will change this.
>
>> + samsung,pmu-syscon = <&pmu_system_controller>;
>> + #phy-cells = <1>;
>> + };
>
> In general, the idea is quite good, but I think this should rather bind
> to the main PMU node, since this is just a part of the PMU, not another
> device in the system. This also means that the PMU node itself should be
> the PHY provider.
>
Please correct me if I got you wrong. You want somthing like this:
pmu_system_controller: system-controller@10040000 {
...
simple_phys: simple-phys {
compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-simple-phy";
...
};
};
Regards,
Rahul Sharma.
> Otherwise looks good.
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
