On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 04:57:06PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > The capacity of a CPU/group should be some intrinsic value that doesn't > change with task placement. It is like a container which capacity is > stable regardless of the amount of liquid in it... unless the container > itself is crushed that is, but that's another story. > > Therefore let's rename "has_capacity" to "has_free_capacity" in order to > better convey the wanted meaning. >
Yeah, not really, the whole capacity thing is bollocks, but sure we can rename it for as long as it still lives ;-)
pgpSDHKkHEkeJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
