On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 04:05:51PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 09:30:58AM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 01:47:57PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:48:17PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > > > In perf's 'mem-mode', one can get access to a whole bunch of details
> > > > specific to a
> > > > particular sample instruction. A bunch of those details relate to the
> > > > data
> > > > address.
> > > >
> > > > One interesting thing you can do with data addresses is to convert them
> > > > into a unique
> > > > cacheline they belong too. Organizing these data cachelines into
> > > > similar groups and sorting
> > > > them can reveal cache contention.
> > > >
> > > > This patch creates an alogorithm based on various sample details that
> > > > can help group
> > > > entries together into data cachelines and allows 'perf report' to sort
> > > > on it.
> > > >
> > > > The algorithm relies on having proper mmap2 support in the kernel to
> > > > help determine
> > > > if the memory map the data address belongs to is private to a pid or
> > > > globally shared.
> > > >
> > > > The alogortithm is as follows:
> > > >
> > > > o group cpumodes together
> > > > o group entries with discovered maps together
> > > > o sort on major, minor, inode and inode generation numbers
> > > > o if userspace anon, then sort on pid
> > > > o sort on cachelines based on data addresses
> > >
> > > needs some collumn width refresh or something..? ;-)
> >
> > Not sure what you mean here.
> >
> > >
> > > # Overhead Data Cacheline
> > > # ........ .......................
>
> header not being wide enough to cover the longest data
Ah. Ok. So I am not sure the right way to fix that. As the current
header seems to be hardcoded with a bunch of spaces. Is there a trick to
dynamically space it correctly based on the data provided?
>
>
> > > #
> > > 5.42% [k] 0xffff8801ed832c40
> > > 5.29% [.] sys_errlist@@GLIBC_2.12+0xffffffcbf7dfc1ff
> > >
> > > 3.16% [k] 0xffffffffff5690c0
> > >
> > >
> > > also I've got again perf hanged up on opening device file
> > >
> > > [jolsa@krava perf]$ sudo strace -p 29445
> > > Process 29445 attached
> > > open("/dev/snd/pcmC0D0p", O_RDONLY^CProcess 29445 detached
> > >
> > > another one I recall was /dev/dri/card0 touched by X server
> > >
> > > I guess those device files allow to mmap memory and we recorded
> > > memory access there.. we need check for this and do not try to
> > > open device files
> >
> > Ok. And that problem doesn't happen when my patch is not applied? I am
> > not sure how this patch causes open device hangs. I'll try to run this on
> > a box with X server running to duplicate.
>
> I think it came with the memory profiling, because we treat
> data areas as dsos.. open and look for symbols
Yeah, I figured that too. I guess I was trying to point out this is a
generic memory profiling issue that isn't related to my patch. But I will
still try to track down the problem as it needs to be fixed. :-)
Cheers,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
