On Wed, 21 May 2014, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2014, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Sebastian Ott
> > <seb...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 20 May 2014, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> > >> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Sebastian Ott
> > >> <seb...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >> > On Tue, 20 May 2014, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > >> >> On Mon, 19 May 2014, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> > >> >> > It is entirely possible the bug isn't
> > >> >> > caused by the referenced commit, as the commit you're pointing to 
> > >> >> > merely
> > >> >> > makes io_destroy() syscall wait for all aio outstanding to complete
> > >> >> > before returning.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I cannot reproduce this when I revert said commit (on top of 
> > >> >> 14186fe). If
> > >> >> that matters - the arch is s390.
> > >> >
> > >> > Hm, ok - maybe that commit is really just highlighting a refcounting 
> > >> > bug.
> > >> > I just compared traces for a good and a few bad cases. The good case:
> > >> > # tracer: function
> > >> > #
> > >> > # entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 16/16   #P:4
> > >> > #
> > >> > #                              _-----=> irqs-off
> > >> > #                             / _----=> need-resched
> > >> > #                            | / _---=> hardirq/softirq
> > >> > #                            || / _--=> preempt-depth
> > >> > #                            ||| /     delay
> > >> > #           TASK-PID   CPU#  ||||    TIMESTAMP  FUNCTION
> > >> > #              | |       |   ||||       |         |
> > >> >              fio-732   [003] ....    17.989315: kill_ioctx 
> > >> > <-SyS_io_destroy
> > >> >              fio-739   [003] ....    18.000563: kill_ioctx 
> > >> > <-SyS_io_destroy
> > >> >      ksoftirqd/3-19    [003] ..s.    18.031673: free_ioctx_users 
> > >> > <-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
> > >> >      ksoftirqd/3-19    [003] ..s.    18.031679: free_ioctx_users 
> > >> > <-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
> > >> >              fio-737   [003] ....    18.038765: kill_ioctx 
> > >> > <-SyS_io_destroy
> > >> >      ksoftirqd/3-19    [003] ..s.    18.062488: free_ioctx_reqs 
> > >> > <-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
> > >> >      ksoftirqd/3-19    [003] ..s.    18.062494: free_ioctx_reqs 
> > >> > <-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
> > >> >      kworker/3:1-57    [003] ....    18.062499: free_ioctx 
> > >> > <-process_one_work
> > >> >      kworker/3:1-57    [003] ....    18.062506: free_ioctx 
> > >> > <-process_one_work
> > >> >      ksoftirqd/3-19    [003] ..s.    18.072275: free_ioctx_users 
> > >> > <-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
> > >> >              fio-738   [003] ....    18.102419: kill_ioctx 
> > >> > <-SyS_io_destroy
> > >> >           <idle>-0     [003] .ns.    18.111668: free_ioctx_reqs 
> > >> > <-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
> > >> >      kworker/3:1-57    [003] ....    18.111675: free_ioctx 
> > >> > <-process_one_work
> > >> >      ksoftirqd/3-19    [003] ..s.    18.138035: free_ioctx_users 
> > >> > <-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
> > >> >           <idle>-0     [003] .ns.    18.191665: free_ioctx_reqs 
> > >> > <-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
> > >> >      kworker/3:1-57    [003] ....    18.191671: free_ioctx 
> > >> > <-process_one_work
> > >> >
> > >> > (4 fio workers, free_ioctx_reqs is called 4 times)
> > >> >
> > >> > One of the bad cases:
> > >> > # tracer: function
> > >> > #
> > >> > # entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 14/14   #P:4
> > >> > #
> > >> > #                              _-----=> irqs-off
> > >> > #                             / _----=> need-resched
> > >> > #                            | / _---=> hardirq/softirq
> > >> > #                            || / _--=> preempt-depth
> > >> > #                            ||| /     delay
> > >> > #           TASK-PID   CPU#  ||||    TIMESTAMP  FUNCTION
> > >> > #              | |       |   ||||       |         |
> > >> >              fio-834   [000] ....    51.127359: kill_ioctx 
> > >> > <-SyS_io_destroy
> > >> >           <idle>-0     [000] ..s.    51.170237: free_ioctx_users 
> > >> > <-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
> > >> >              fio-828   [001] ....    51.189717: kill_ioctx 
> > >> > <-SyS_io_destroy
> > >> >              fio-833   [001] ..s.    51.220178: free_ioctx_users 
> > >> > <-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
> > >> >           <idle>-0     [000] .ns.    51.220230: free_ioctx_reqs 
> > >> > <-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
> > >> >      kworker/0:3-661   [000] ....    51.220238: free_ioctx 
> > >> > <-process_one_work
> > >> >           <idle>-0     [001] .ns.    51.260188: free_ioctx_reqs 
> > >> > <-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
> > >> >      kworker/1:2-103   [001] ....    51.260198: free_ioctx 
> > >> > <-process_one_work
> > >> >              fio-833   [002] ....    51.287602: kill_ioctx 
> > >> > <-SyS_io_destroy
> > >> >            udevd-868   [002] ..s1    51.332519: free_ioctx_users 
> > >> > <-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
> > >> >           <idle>-0     [002] .ns.    51.450180: free_ioctx_reqs 
> > >> > <-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
> > >> >      kworker/2:2-191   [002] ....    51.450191: free_ioctx 
> > >> > <-process_one_work
> > >> >              fio-835   [003] ....    51.907530: kill_ioctx 
> > >> > <-SyS_io_destroy
> > >> >      ksoftirqd/3-19    [003] ..s.    52.000232: free_ioctx_users 
> > >> > <-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
> > >> >
> > >> > (1 fio worker in D state, free_ioctx_reqs is called 3 times)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Looking at the second trace: the first 3 io_destroy() calls cause
> > >> free_ioctx_reqs(), but the last one does not call free_ioctx_reqs().
> > >> Do you have more logs after the last line?
> > >
> > > Nope that was all.
> > >
> > >> If there is no more
> > >> free_ioctx_reqs() then it means something keeps ctx->reqs refcounter.
> > >> I suggest to add some logging to kernel to figure out what is the
> > >> refcount value at this moment.
> > >
> > > Jep, I did that this morning (via atomic_read(&ctx->reqs.count) in
> > > free_ioctx_users before percpu_ref_kill(&ctx->reqs); is called) and
> > > the value was always the same
> > >         1 + (1UL << 31)
> > > even for the free_ioctx_users invocations that were not followed by
> > > free_ioctx_reqs.
> > 
> > Could you add atomic_read(&ctx->reqs.count) *after* the
> > percpu_ref_kill(&ctx->reqs)?
> 
> I already did that and it didn't change, always 1 + (1UL << 31) in all
> cases, before and after percpu_ref_kill(&ctx->reqs). I'm not really
> familiar with this percpu_ref stuff but it looks like the initial
> reference is dropped asynchronous.


cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
# tracer: function
#
# entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 25/25   #P:4
#
#                              _-----=> irqs-off
#                             / _----=> need-resched
#                            | / _---=> hardirq/softirq
#                            || / _--=> preempt-depth
#                            ||| /     delay
#           TASK-PID   CPU#  ||||    TIMESTAMP  FUNCTION
#              | |       |   ||||       |         |
             fio-856   [001] ....   160.876428: SyS_io_destroy: 0000000074a18000
             fio-856   [001] ....   160.876430: kill_ioctx <-SyS_io_destroy
             fio-855   [000] ....   160.887737: SyS_io_destroy: 0000000074f40600
             fio-855   [000] ....   160.887738: kill_ioctx <-SyS_io_destroy
             fio-849   [001] ..s.   160.911948: free_ioctx_users 
<-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
     ksoftirqd/0-3     [000] ..s.   160.932488: free_ioctx_users 
<-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
             fio-854   [001] ....   160.938881: SyS_io_destroy: 0000000074ac0600
             fio-854   [001] ....   160.938881: kill_ioctx <-SyS_io_destroy
     ksoftirqd/1-11    [001] ..s.   160.942016: aio_confirm_reqs: 
0000000074a18000 reqs=1
     ksoftirqd/1-11    [001] ..s.   160.942016: free_ioctx_reqs 
<-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
     kworker/1:2-465   [001] ....   160.942021: free_ioctx <-process_one_work
             fio-856   [002] ....   160.942033: SyS_io_destroy: 
0000000074a18000 done
             fio-849   [002] ....   160.942641: SyS_io_destroy: 0000000074f28600
             fio-849   [002] ....   160.942641: kill_ioctx <-SyS_io_destroy
     ksoftirqd/1-11    [001] ..s.   160.961981: free_ioctx_users 
<-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
          <idle>-0     [000] .ns.   160.962010: aio_confirm_reqs: 
0000000074f40600 reqs=1
          <idle>-0     [000] .ns.   160.962011: free_ioctx_reqs 
<-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
     kworker/0:0-4     [000] ....   160.962016: free_ioctx <-process_one_work
             fio-855   [001] ....   160.962017: SyS_io_destroy: 
0000000074f40600 done
     ksoftirqd/2-15    [002] ..s.   160.971998: free_ioctx_users 
<-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
     ksoftirqd/1-11    [001] ..s.   160.994552: aio_confirm_reqs: 
0000000074ac0600 reqs=2
          <idle>-0     [002] .ns.   161.061976: aio_confirm_reqs: 
0000000074f28600 reqs=1
          <idle>-0     [002] .ns.   161.061976: free_ioctx_reqs 
<-percpu_ref_kill_rcu
     kworker/2:2-181   [002] ....   161.061980: free_ioctx <-process_one_work
             fio-849   [003] ....   161.061983: SyS_io_destroy: 
0000000074f28600 done


diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
index a0ed6c7..3b8e989 100644
--- a/fs/aio.c
+++ b/fs/aio.c
@@ -521,6 +521,13 @@ static void free_ioctx_reqs(struct percpu_ref *ref)
        schedule_work(&ctx->free_work);
 }
 
+void aio_confirm_reqs(struct percpu_ref *ref)
+{
+       struct kioctx *ctx = container_of(ref, struct kioctx, reqs);
+
+       trace_printk("%p reqs=%d\n", ctx, atomic_read(&ref->count));
+}
+
 /*
  * When this function runs, the kioctx has been removed from the "hash table"
  * and ctx->users has dropped to 0, so we know no more kiocbs can be submitted 
-
@@ -543,7 +550,7 @@ static void free_ioctx_users(struct percpu_ref *ref)
 
        spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->ctx_lock);
 
-       percpu_ref_kill(&ctx->reqs);
+       percpu_ref_kill_and_confirm(&ctx->reqs, aio_confirm_reqs);
        percpu_ref_put(&ctx->reqs);
 }
 
@@ -1220,6 +1227,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(io_destroy, aio_context_t, ctx)
                struct completion requests_done =
                        COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK(requests_done);
 
+               trace_printk("%p\n", ioctx);
+
                /* Pass requests_done to kill_ioctx() where it can be set
                 * in a thread-safe way. If we try to set it here then we have
                 * a race condition if two io_destroy() called simultaneously.
@@ -1232,6 +1241,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(io_destroy, aio_context_t, ctx)
                 * is destroyed.
                 */
                wait_for_completion(&requests_done);
+               trace_printk("%p done\n", ioctx);
 
                return 0;
        }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to