On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:14:16AM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:09:36AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > This series is aimed at regressions noticed during reclaim activity. The > > first two patches are shrinker patches that were posted ages ago but never > > merged for reasons that are unclear to me. I'm posting them again to see if > > there was a reason they were dropped or if they just got lost. Dave? Time? > > The last patch adjusts proportional reclaim. Yuanhan Liu, can you retest > > the vm scalability test cases on a larger machine? Hugh, does this work > > for you on the memcg test cases? > > Sure, and here is the result. I applied these 3 patches on v3.15-rc6, > and head commit is 60c10afd. e82e0561 is the old commit that introduced > the regression. The testserver has 512G memory and 120 CPU. > > It's a simple result; if you need more data, I can gather them and send > it to you tomorrow: > > e82e0561 v3.15-rc6 60c10afd > ---------------------------------------- > 18560785 12232122 38868453 > -34% +109 > > As you can see, the performance is back, and it is way much better ;) >
Thanks a lot for that and the quick response. It is much appreciated. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
