Hi Kukjin,
Today's linux-next merge of the samsung tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c between commit 46bfc99c9225 ("ARM: l2c:
exynos: convert to generic l2c OF initialisation (and thereby fix it)")
from the arm tree and commit 3919fb954b3a ("ARM: EXYNOS: Remove
exynos_subsys registration") from the samsung tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
diff --cc arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
index afce154f83f9,93507ee98c86..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
@@@ -241,17 -246,22 +243,6 @@@ void __init exynos_init_io(void
exynos_map_io();
}
- struct bus_type exynos_subsys = {
- .name = "exynos-core",
- .dev_name = "exynos-core",
- };
-
- static int __init exynos_core_init(void)
-static int __init exynos4_l2x0_cache_init(void)
--{
- return subsys_system_register(&exynos_subsys, NULL);
- int ret;
-
- ret = l2x0_of_init(L2_AUX_VAL, L2_AUX_MASK);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_S5P_SLEEP)) {
- l2x0_regs_phys = virt_to_phys(&l2x0_saved_regs);
- clean_dcache_area(&l2x0_regs_phys, sizeof(unsigned long));
- }
- return 0;
--}
- core_initcall(exynos_core_init);
-early_initcall(exynos4_l2x0_cache_init);
--
static void __init exynos_dt_machine_init(void)
{
struct device_node *i2c_np;
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
