On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 12:03 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > On 08/05/2014 16:56, Arnd Bergmann : > > There is architecture code in mach-at91 that depends on the > > CONFIG_ATMEL_PWM symbol in order to call the soc-specific > > at91_add_device_pwm function. While all of this is about code > > that will be removed in the future, using DT probing and > > the PWM framework, we currently get a build failure: > > > > arch/arm/mach-at91/built-in.o: In function `at91_pwm_leds': > > arch/arm/mach-at91/leds.c:88: undefined reference to `at91_add_device_pwm' > > > > This patch ensures we only try to build this driver on > > platforms on which it will build and work. > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> > > Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]>
It seems this one just landed in linux-next (in next-20140528). > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/misc/Kconfig > > index fe2230c..ce29342 100644 > > --- a/drivers/misc/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/misc/Kconfig > > @@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ config AD525X_DPOT_SPI > > > > config ATMEL_PWM > > tristate "Atmel AT32/AT91 PWM support" > > - depends on HAVE_CLK && (AVR32 || ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST) > > + depends on HAVE_CLK > > + depends on AVR32 || AT91SAM9263 || AT91SAM9RL || AT91SAM9G45 Symbols AT91SAM9263, AT91SAM9RL, and AT91SAM9G45 do not seem to exist in next-20140528. Should these perhaps be SOC_AT91SAM9263, SOC_AT91SAM9RL, and SOC_AT91SAM9G45 and/or ARCH_AT91SAM9263, ARCH_AT91SAM9RL, and ARCH_AT91SAM9G45? > > help > > This option enables device driver support for the PWM channels > > on certain Atmel processors. Pulse Width Modulation is used for > > Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
